���˾þ�

I set the New ���˾þ� Book Club something of a challenge in April: make your way through the 600-plus pages of Red Mars, Kim Stanley Robinson’s doorstopper of a novel, in just 30 days, and then tell us what you thought of it on our lively new channel (and do please show your working).

I’ll admit to some self-interest here: I think of Red Mars as one of my all-time favourite books, but I haven’t read it for years. So, when reviewer George Bass wrote me a great piece about how this story of the first 100 astronauts and scientists to live on Mars opens in 2026, I jumped at a reason to revisit it with our community of 25,000 avid readers. I wasn’t disappointed. Robinson brings the vast landscapes and alien beauty of Mars to life with great skill, and I enjoyed the way the story moves between viewpoints. Sometimes we hear from Ann, who is desperate to ensure that this ancient world isn’t interfered with by humans (she’s a “Red”). Sometimes we look in on Sax, who is out to terraform Mars as quickly as he can (he’s a “Green”). I particularly enjoyed the perspective of the practical and no-nonsense engineer Nadia, but I did find myself a little irritated with the drawn-out love triangle of John, Frank and Maya, all of whom very much suffer from Main Character Syndrome.

Author Kim Stanley Robinson revisits his vision of life on Mars

As our book club revisits Red Mars, Kim Stanley Robinson reflects on imagining a 2026 Mars mission — and how today’s colonisation plans and climate realities measure up.

Some book club members were also rereading Red Mars, others were coming to it for the first time and yet another group had had it on their shelves for a while and were delighted to have a prompt to finally get round to reading it. First-time reader DavidC was instantly gripped: “Even on the very first page there was something about the phrase ‘But all of that happened in mineral unconsciousness’ I found really captivating,” he wrote on Discord. “It tells me I’m in good hands for the next 600 pages.”

TheGosia wasn’t convinced by the dramatic opening, however, in which a key character is murdered. “I’m not loving the concept of spoiling the end with the first chapter? I think I would have preferred not to know where all this is going. Unless it’s not the end but the middle? Still, not convinced so far…” she wrote. Members, including me, were quick to reassure her, and she kept going.

I actually asked Robinson about his decision to start the book this way, when I chatted with him in our video interview. “It’s a flash forward, which I think was a good trick,” he told me. “We see Frank arrange the murder of John. We don’t know why. He’s obviously wound-up, intense, angry. We still don’t know why, but we know that John’s died. And then we go back to the beginning of the story. Building a town [on Mars] is not inherently dramatic. But if in that building of the town, you know that someone’s going to end up so angry at the end of it that they are going to arrange the murder of one of their best friends, you therefore see every little incident of building the town as having a fraught significance that you know about, but nobody else knows about.”

Free newsletter

Sign up to Book Club

Join our friendly crowd of fellow book club members in reading and discussing the latest in science and science fiction.

Sign up to newsletter

Robinson reread the novel himself relatively recently, and found he was still pleased with how it turned out. “I had forgotten enough that it was a little fresh, and it seemed to me it held up pretty well,” he said – acknowledging that there are “hilarious gaps in my knowledge of the year 2026 and after”. He delved further into this in an essay for the book club in which he also lambasted current “fatuous” plans to colonise Mars, something he very much also got into in our interview. “These people aren’t thinking it through, the ones who say, like [Elon] Musk, ‘Oh, well we need to colonise Mars in order save Earth.’ That’s crap.”

As for our team of readers, there was something of a mixed response, with many, like me, admiring Robinson’s nature writing about Mars: the planet is probably the book’s main character, I’d say. But quite a few readers didn’t warm so much to Robinson’s cast of characters.

Read an extract from Kim Stanley Robinson's sci-fi classic Red Mars

This is the opening of Kim Stanley Robinson's Red Mars, the New ���˾þ� Book Club read for April, as humans come to the planet to settle it

“I think it was amazing in a lot of ways: the nature descriptions, the general scope, how well researched it was; I loved the scenes of vast destruction. It also has interesting ideas about running society. But ultimately I couldn’t really connect with any of the characters and a lot of the events didn’t follow any logic for me,” said TheGosia.

Ani Greenwood made it to the end, but then had to dive straight into a relationship drama as a palate cleanser. “I needed a relationships infusion after Red Mars, where the characters, though in themselves diverse, did not feel that complex to me and where the dynamic of the book was more idea oriented,” she wrote. “The writing was so good, I really mourned my inability at the moment to give his story my heart. I would love to have lingered more over the nature descriptions.”

There were also some great discussions about how quickly things break down on Mars – would the planners on Earth not have chosen their 100 astronauts more wisely, to have included fewer revolutionaries? “I started in expecting/hoping for competence porn—a story focused on a team of scientists and engineers overcoming life-threatening challenges in an unforgiving, harsh environment—and instead got a soap opera mix of human politics, greed, callousness, and lack of foresight. The lack of foresight in particular was what bothered me most,” said Barbara Howe. “I did like the descriptions of the Martian landscape and some sections—most of Part 7, for example—were pretty compelling reading, but the love triangle was annoying, and the only characters I really found interesting were Nadia, Arkady [a Russian engineer, revolutionary and anarchist], and—somewhat surprisingly, and late in the book—Ann.”

Overall, I’d say members enjoyed reading (or rereading) and dissecting this classic of science fiction; they certainly had plenty to say about it! As for me, I was pleased to discover Red Mars remains one of my all-time favourites.

Sign up here to join the New ���˾þ� Book Club, and join the discussion on .