Sociologist Steven Yearley takes a long look at the way in which ideas such
as “think globally, act locally” spring from a mistaken assumption that we all
mean the same thing when we discuss the world or global problems. In Sociology,
Environmentalism, Globalization (Sage, £12.95, ISBN 0 8039 7517 1), he
asserts that in capturing the moral high ground by claiming the planet for
themselves, environmentalists are ignoring the fragmented nature of many of the
problems they want to resolve. And the emotional construct that hangs round the
notion that we are all global now, united in defence of planet Earth, obscures
the real forces acting to damage the environment. Even the role of science as
arbiter of quarrels about pollution, for example, is questioned.
More from New ÒÁÈ˾þÃ
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Popular articles
Trending New ÒÁÈ˾þà articles
1
Mathematicians stunned by AI's biggest breakthrough in mathematics yet
2
How I used psychology to come back from the worst year of my life
3
Epic dreaming is leaving people exhausted and distressed
4
The Selfish Gene at 50: Why Dawkins’s evolution classic still holds up
5
The distant world that is our best hope of finding alien life
6
Photos reveal unexpected details from the world's first atomic test
7
The 3 things you need to know about protein, according to an expert
8
The ‘doomsday’ glacier’s giant ice shelf is about to break away
9
Mystery of the ancient giant stone jars of Laos may have been solved
10
We may finally have a cure for many different autoimmune conditions



