In Science as a Questioning Process (Institute of Physics, £20, ISBN 0
7503 0369 7), astrophysicist Nigel Sanitt puts forward a stiff new test for
scientific theories: stated simply, any theory worth the name has to answer more
questions than it raises. Using a process he calls zetetic analysis, he shows,
for instance, that Darwinism was not a proper theory, though Neo-Darwinism is.
For good measure, he crams in some reflections on the lack of certainty in
science and its close resemblance to literature.
More from New ÒÁÈ˾þÃ
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Advertorial
The defence sector can’t adopt a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to AI
Advertising
Advertorial
Why the future of defence is drone tech and distributed edge computing
Advertising
Advertorial
The future of defence lies in transatlantic industrial partnerships
Advertising
Advertorial
The biggest defence risk is a lack of integration, not technology
Advertising
Popular articles
Trending New ÒÁÈ˾þà articles
1
A quantum state that lasts forever may finally be within our grasp
2
We've found a mysterious substance on Titan and Pluto
3
Faecal transplant makes the brains of old mice act young again
4
The secrets to keeping your brain sharp in old age
5
Has the answer to life's origins been hiding in our cells all along?
6
We may have finally solved cosmology's chicken-or-the-egg problem
7
Wildlife thrives in solar farm built on restored peatland
8
Remarkable fossils rewrite the story of how animals conquered the land
9
Toy universe shows that time could be a quantum illusion
10
Fully autonomous drones have killed human soldiers for the first time
