SHOULD scientists ever put a gloss on their data to bolster support for a “good cause”? Growing unhappiness about the Red List – the Oscars of extinction risk – underline why this is bad idea (see “Conservation’s ‘Red List’ is unscientific and often wrong”). Through the list, the International Union for Conservation of Nature has done an admirable job in alerting us to the threat of species loss, but in doing so it omitted to highlight the uncertainty in its findings. As a result, valuable resources may be going into saving the wrong species, and the list itself stands to lose…
To continue reading, today with our introductory offers
Advertisement
More from New ÒÁÈ˾þÃ
Explore the latest news, articles and features
Life
Extinct relative of koalas discovered in Western Australia
News
Physics
The 50-year quest to create a quantum spin liquid may finally be over
Features
Technology
Backlash builds over NHS plan to hide source code from AI hacking risk
News
Health
Hantavirus: Where has the deadly cruise ship outbreak come from?
News
Popular articles
Trending New ÒÁÈ˾þà articles
1
Man destined to get Alzheimer’s saved by accidental heat therapy
2
Woman in cancer remission without treatment in highly unusual case
3
A lost ancient script reveals how writing as we know it really began
4
We have figured out a new way to send messages into the past
5
Hantavirus: Where has the deadly cruise ship outbreak come from?
6
Prebiotic chewing gum could be helpful for gum disease
7
Novel approach to clearing brain waste shows promise for Alzheimer's
8
Honey has been used as medicine for centuries – does it really work?
9
100-year-old assumption about the universe may soon be overturned
10
Doubts cast over 'wild' claim that magnetic control can turn on genes
